PEP 646: Add acceptance note, bump Python version#2261
Merged
JelleZijlstra merged 2 commits intomainfrom Jan 24, 2022
Merged
Conversation
This is what I meant in https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/OR5RKV7GAVSGLVH3JAGQ6OXFAXIP5XDX/ Is it OK with you, PEP authors?
gvanrossum
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2022
Member
gvanrossum
left a comment
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LG for now. We could also go through a bried typing-sig discussion to clarify details around multiple unpackings, and update the PEP accordingly.
@encukou Could you add the Resolution header while you're here?
encukou
commented
Jan 24, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is what I meant in https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/OR5RKV7GAVSGLVH3JAGQ6OXFAXIP5XDX/
Is it OK with you, PEP authors?